Not publishable as-is. 5 of 8 publication_gate checks fail. The renderer displays the gate rather than suppressing it. Legal review and sub-brief approval are informational and are not part of this test.
Chile
CLschema crypto-v2.0.0trajectory: not yet assessedin transitionoverlaps: FIM
Last updated update date not yet available · 8 categories · 11 sourced
findings · 7 sources in the cumulative register
8Categoriesbaseline.
11Findings.claims[]
0Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix(sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.
Jurisdiction brief
No content recorded at this JID path.
8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density
Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.
Chile has no crypto-specific licensing statute. Instead, the general Fintech Law (Ley N° 21.521, enacted January 2023) created a CMF-administered 'Financial Services Providers Registry' covering an enumerated list of fintech activities (crowdfunding platforms, alternative transaction systems, credit/investment advisory, custody of financial instruments, order routers/financial-instrument intermediaries). CMF General Rule No. 502 (Norma de Carácter General N° 502), effective 3 February 2024, operationalises registration and authorization for these enumerated categories. Crypto-asset exchanges and virtual-asset service providers (VASPs) as such are not an explicitly named category; a crypto business only falls inside the CMF perimeter if its activity matches one of the enumerated services and the underlying token qualifies as a regulated financial instrument. This creates a coverage gap for pure crypto-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat exchange/custody services that do not intermediate CMF-recognised financial instruments.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (4)
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Banco de Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Banco de Chile) — Law No. 21,521 (the Fintech Law), enacted in January 2023, establishes a general framework for financial services provided through technological means, aiming to protect financial customers and data privacy while preserving financial stability and strengthening anti-money-laundering controls.retrieved M4bindingin force
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile) — CMF General Rule No. 502, issued 12 January 2024 and effective 3 February 2024, regulates the registration and authorization process for companies providing enumerated fintech services (crowdfunding platforms, alternative transaction systems, credit and investment advice, custody of financial instruments, order routers and financial instrument intermediaries) via a Financial Services Providers Registry administered by the CMF, with a 12-month transition window for existing entities.retrieved M5bindingin force
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile) — The categories enumerated under CMF General Rule No. 502 do not explicitly name crypto-asset exchanges or virtual asset service providers as a standalone regulated activity; such entities appear to fall within the CMF perimeter only where their conduct matches an enumerated service (e.g., custody of financial instruments, operation of an alternative transaction system) and the relevant crypto asset is treated as a financial instrument.retrieved M4non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile) — In April 2019 the Chilean government referenced a forthcoming bill 'regulating cryptocurrencies and fintech' intended to ensure regulatory symmetry between traditional financial services and technology-based industries; this early legislative initiative preceded and informed the eventual Fintech Law (Ley 21.521) but did not itself enact crypto-specific rules.retrieved M2non-binding
Chile has not enacted a bespoke statutory taxonomy for crypto-assets (no equivalent to MiCA's ART/EMT/utility-token distinctions). The general Securities Market Law (Ley N° 18,045) governs whether an instrument constitutes a 'valor' (security) subject to CMF disclosure, insider-trading and market-manipulation rules; classification of any given token as a security is understood to be assessed case-by-case under this general law rather than under crypto-specific criteria. Confirmation of CMF's current case-by-case classification practice requires primary-source follow-up.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (2)
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing) — Chilean securities markets are principally regulated by the CMF under the Securities Market Law (Law No. 18,045), which sets disclosure requirements, restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, and protections for minority shareholders for instruments deemed 'valores' (securities).retrieved M3bindingin force
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing) — No bespoke Chilean statutory taxonomy distinguishing security tokens, e-money tokens, asset-referenced tokens, stablecoins, or utility tokens was identified; classification appears to rely on general application of Law No. 18,045 criteria to individual tokens.retrieved M3non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
No Chile-specific regulatory treatment of on-chain activities (staking, DeFi lending, DEX operation, mining, node/validator operation, tokenization) was located in this research pass. Absence of evidence is not evidence of a formal exemption; this is recorded as an open research gap rather than a confirmed unregulated status.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (1)
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile) — No claim recorded: Chile-specific rules on on-chain activities (staking, DeFi lending, DEX, mining, node/validator operation, tokenization) were not located in this research pass.retrieved M2non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
No Chile-specific stablecoin authorization, reserve, redemption, disclosure, or systemic-designation regime (analogous to MiCA Titles III/IV) was identified. Stablecoins appear to be treated, if at all, under general securities/payment-system law rather than a dedicated stablecoin framework.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (1)
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Republic of Chile) — No dedicated Chilean stablecoin issuance-authorisation, reserve, or redemption-right framework was identified in this research pass.retrieved M3non-bindinga fact about the regime
No Chile-specific crypto consumer-protection rules (marketing restrictions, custody segregation, complaint-handling, suitability) were located. General Securities Market Law protections (disclosure, minority-investor safeguards) apply only to instruments classified as regulated financial products, leaving retail purchasers of unclassified crypto assets without a clearly identified tailored protection regime.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (1)
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing) — No crypto-specific consumer-protection rules (marketing restrictions, custody segregation, complaint handling, suitability/appropriateness tests) applicable to retail crypto-asset purchasers were located in this research pass.retrieved M4non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
No Chile-specific crypto tax circular or ruling (e.g., a Servicio de Impuestos Internos administrative interpretation on crypto capital gains, income characterization, VAT/IVA, or reporting obligations) was located in this research pass. Absent confirmation, general Chilean income-tax rules would presumptively apply to crypto-asset disposals, but this has not been verified against a primary SII source this session.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (1)
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Banco de Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Banco de Chile) — No SII circular, oficio, or ruling specifically addressing crypto-asset tax treatment (capital gains, income characterization, VAT/IVA, withholding, or reporting obligations) was located in this research pass.retrieved M3non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
No crypto-specific cross-border transfer, outbound-restriction, or reporting-threshold rule was located. Chile's general foreign-exchange reporting framework (administered by the Banco Central de Chile) may apply to large cross-border transfers generally, but its specific application to crypto-asset transfers has not been confirmed in this research pass.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (1)
T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Banco de Chile)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filing by Banco de Chile) — No Chile-specific crypto cross-border transfer restriction, sanctions-nexus rule, or reporting threshold distinct from general foreign-exchange reporting requirements was located in this research pass.retrieved M3non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
Crypto AML/CFT content is owned by the fleet's FIM aml_ctf module; no aml_cft_regime claims are produced within this crypto baseline. For disambiguation only: Chile's AML/CFT system is coordinated by the Unidad de Análisis Financiero (UAF), with the CMF and the Superintendencies of Gambling Casinos and Pensions holding sector-specific regulatory/supervisory roles, per GAFILAT's 2021 Mutual Evaluation Report of Chile.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
No categories match.
Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across
groups.
Publication gate
Blocking. 5 failing check(s).
schema_valid
pass
min_architecture_patterns
0
min_red_flags
0
min_controls
0
worked_examples_count
0
decision_tree_nodes
0
counterparty_diligence_questions
0
min_t1_per_instrument_met
FAIL
min_quoted_text_present
waived — floor 0%
translation_provenance_recorded
FAIL
egress_verified
FAIL
board_briefing_present
FAIL
every_practical_object_has_source_id
n/a — no subject in this jurisdiction
source_tier_integrity_ok
pass
jurisdiction_source_floor_met
FAIL
tier_a_b_national_primary_pct
0.0
aggregator_only_jurisdiction_count
0
manual_override
Editorial metadata
Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.
Editorial metadata for Chile
Field
Value
trust.lawyer_review.status
never_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewer
no reviewer on record
trust.content_source
ai_generated
Provenance and declared absence
Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.
Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.
Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.