Not publishable as-is. 1 of 5 publication_gate checks fail. The renderer displays the gate rather than suppressing it. Legal review and sub-brief approval are informational and are not part of this test.
Louisiana, USA
US-LAschema crypto-v2.0.0trajectory: not yet assessedregulatedoverlaps: FIM
Last updated · 7 categories · 15 sourced
findings · 12 sources in the cumulative register
7Categoriesbaseline.
15Findings.claims[]
6Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix(sums to 7 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.
Jurisdiction lead brief
Lead Signal
Louisiana's crypto regulatory posture has bifurcated this cycle. Senate Bill 185 (Act 331) rescinded the prior license-exception provision under the Louisiana Virtual Currency Businesses Act, meaning any person exchanging, transferring, or storing virtual currency for Louisiana customers, or operating a custodial wallet or exchange serving Louisiana users, must now hold a Louisiana virtual-currency-business license with no volume-based exemption. At the same time, the Blockchain Basics Act protects self-custody of digital assets and home digital-asset mining from additional state licensing requirements, and imposes a distinct foreign-ownership restriction: foreign-owned digital-asset mining facilities operating in Louisiana must divest or cease operations within one year of the law's effect, or face fines of up to one million dollars.
Other Developments
Foreign-mining divestment timeline. The foreign-ownership mining restriction is expected to reach its divest-or-shutdown deadline around the first quarter of 2027, one year from the law's effect, giving affected operators a defined but tightening runway.
Deregulatory carve-out coexisting with tightened custodial licensing. The Blockchain Basics Act's self-custody and home-mining exemption operates alongside, rather than in place of, the tightened Virtual Currency Businesses Act licensing perimeter for custodial and exchange business, producing a genuinely bifurcated regime rather than a uniform tightening or loosening.
Cross-Monitor Connections
The AML/CFT regime slot for Louisiana crypto activity is supplied by the financial-integrity monitor's own D7 and D5 assessment and is not analysed here. Louisiana's broader money-transmission modernization, tracked separately by the world-payments monitor, is a related but distinct development from the crypto-specific licensing regime addressed in this brief.
Outlook
Watch for the exact enactment date and legislative session of the Title 6 Chapter 23 redesignation of the Blockchain Basics Act, which could not be confirmed within this cycle's search budget, and for whether the foreign-owned mining divestment provision proves to be part of the original 2024 House Bill 488 or a later amendment — a gap that remains unresolved. The most consequential near-term marker is the approach of the one-year foreign-mining divestment deadline, which will test the practical enforceability of the ownership-based restriction.
7 of 7 categories
Signal
Density
Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.
Louisiana operates a bespoke, crypto-specific licensing regime administered by the Office of Financial Institutions (OFI), separate from — and layered on top of — the state's general money-transmitter law. OFI's non-depository division maintains distinct license/registration categories for 'Virtual Currency Business Activity' and a lighter-touch 'Notification Filers' track, consistent with the two-tier (full license vs. notification-only for small-volume actors) structure originally proposed in the state's virtual-currency licensing bill. Businesses that already hold a comparable license from another state with reciprocal recognition, or individuals under a de minimis annual transaction threshold, may qualify for the notification-only track rather than full licensure. The general Louisiana money transmitter statute (bond, fee, and fitness requirements) continues to apply in parallel to entities whose activity is characterized as money transmission.
Standing sub-brief134 words · last cycle 2026-08-21
Crypto Licensing
Senate Bill 185 (Act 331) rescinded the prior license-exception provision under the Louisiana Virtual Currency Businesses Act, so any person exchanging, transferring, or storing virtual currency for Louisiana customers, or operating a custodial wallet or exchange serving Louisiana users, must now hold a Louisiana virtual-currency-business license with no volume-based exemption. Simultaneously, the Blockchain Basics Act exempts self-custody of digital assets and home digital-asset mining from additional state licensing requirements. The result is a dual-track regime: strict licensing for custodial and exchange business coexists with deregulatory protection for self-custody and home mining, both supervised by the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions.
Outlook
Watch for the exact enactment date and legislative session of the Title 6 Chapter 23 redesignation of the Blockchain Basics Act, which could not be confirmed within this cycle's search budget.
No new data since the standing brief. 1 periodic run re-emitted it unchanged.
Sources and findings (4)
T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — Louisiana OFI maintains a distinct 'Virtual Currency Business Activity' licensing category within its Non-Depository Services Division, separate from the general Money Transmitters category.retrieved M5bindingin force
T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — OFI operates a 'Notification Filers' licensee track as a distinct, lighter-touch registration category alongside full Virtual Currency Business Activity licensure.retrieved M4bindingin force
T4 · CoinDeskCoinDesk — Under the originating legislative design, individuals or entities dealing in less than $35,000 in virtual currency activity annually would only need to file a notification with OFI rather than obtain a full license.retrieved M3bindingin force
T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — Louisiana's general money transmitter statute imposes bonding (minimum $25,000, scaling with transmission volume), annual renewal fees, and licensure conditions administered by OFI that can apply in parallel to virtual-currency businesses characterized as money transmitters.retrieved M3bindingin force
Louisiana has not enacted a state-level statutory taxonomy classifying tokens (e.g., security token vs. utility token vs. stablecoin). Token characterization in the state is governed by federal frameworks — principally SEC application of the Securities Act/Exchange Act 'investment contract' analysis and CFTC commodity characterization — which apply regardless of Louisiana's money-transmission/custody-focused state licensing regime. Louisiana's OFI licensing addresses money-transmission and custody activity, not securities status.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (2)
T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — Louisiana has no bespoke state statutory taxonomy for classifying virtual currency/tokens by type (security, utility, stablecoin, etc.); the OFI licensing regime addresses money-transmission and custody activity rather than token characterization.retrieved M3non-bindinga fact about the regime
T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — Federal SEC guidance treats certain digital securities (tokenized securities) as securities subject to federal securities laws regardless of state money-transmission licensing status, and this federal characterization governs uniformly across Louisiana.retrieved M4bindingin force
Louisiana has not been confirmed to maintain a dedicated statutory framework specifically addressing on-chain activities such as staking, DeFi, DEX operation, mining, node operation, validation, or tokenization as distinct regulatory categories. Federal SEC staff guidance (non-binding staff statement) indicates that self/solo and pool-based proof-of-work mining activities generally do not, under specified conditions, constitute the offer or sale of a security — a federal characterization relevant to any Louisiana-based mining operations, but this is staff-level guidance, not a Commission rule.
Standing sub-brief141 words · last cycle 2026-08-21
On-Chain Activity Regime
The Blockchain Basics Act requires foreign-owned digital-asset mining facilities operating in Louisiana to divest or cease operations within one year of the law's effect, or face fines of up to one million dollars. This foreign-ownership divestment mandate is a distinct restriction not typical of other state mining-rights statutes, which more commonly focus on domestic protections such as energy-rate treatment or zoning rather than ownership-based restrictions. The mandate coexists with the Act's protection of domestic self-custody and home mining from additional licensing burdens, producing a regime that is favorable to domestic on-chain activity while actively restrictive toward foreign-owned mining infrastructure.
Outlook
Whether the foreign-owned mining divestment provision is part of the original 2024 House Bill 488 or a separate later amendment is unresolved; watch for the approach of the one-year divestment deadline, expected around the first quarter of 2027.
No new data since the standing brief. 1 periodic run re-emitted it unchanged.
Sources and findings (2)
T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — SEC Division of Corporation Finance staff has stated that certain protocol (self/solo) mining and mining-pool activities, under specified conditions, do not involve the offer and sale of securities under the Securities Act or Exchange Act — a federal characterization applicable to mining conducted in Louisiana.retrieved M3non-binding
T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — No Louisiana-specific statute or OFI rule dedicated to custodial or non-custodial staking activity was identified; such activity would likely be assessed under the existing virtual-currency/money-transmission licensing trigger rather than a purpose-built staking regime.retrieved M2non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
Louisiana has no identified state-level stablecoin-specific statute governing issuance authorization, reserve requirements, redemption rights, disclosure, or systemic designation for stablecoins. Stablecoin issuance in the U.S. is primarily governed at the federal level (e.g., the GENIUS Act framework for payment stablecoins), which Louisiana has not supplemented with its own bespoke regime as far as this research pass could confirm.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (1)
No Louisiana state-specific stablecoin issuance authorization regime was identified in this research pass; stablecoin issuance in Louisiana is governed by federal frameworks rather than a bespoke state stablecoin statute.M2non-bindinga fact about the regime
The 2026 dual-currency sweepstakes-casino ban (Act 182/HB883) and racketeering predicate-offense expansion (Act 48/HB53) are highly relevant at the crypto/gambling nexus, with the AG's 2025 opinion codified into statute effective 2026-08-01.
Standing sub-brief344 words · last cycle 2026-09-21
Consumer Protection
Louisiana's consumer-protection posture toward virtual-currency-based gambling products tightened materially this cycle. Act 182 (HB883), effective August 1, 2026, rewrites the state's long-standing gambling-by-computer offense, codified at La. R.S. 14:90.3, to explicitly cover dual-currency systems: a product structure in which a consumer purchases a virtual currency that is then exchangeable for a second, cash-redeemable currency. This provision directly targets the sweepstakes-casino business model, which typically layers a non-redeemable promotional currency alongside a second, redeemable sweeps currency to argue around traditional gambling definitions. Act 182 closes that structural argument by name, and it raises the maximum fine under the statute from $20,000 to $100,000, a fivefold increase that signals the state's intent to make the economics of continued operation untenable for non-compliant platforms.
This is a confirmed, in-force, binding development, sourced to Louisiana Attorney General action and reported through trade press covering the statute's effective date. It follows directly from a 2025 Attorney General legal opinion that had already concluded dual-currency virtual-currency gaming products constituted illegal gambling under existing Louisiana statutes; Act 182 converts that opinion into explicit statutory text rather than leaving the matter to interpretive risk. For any operator or platform whose virtual-currency design includes a purchasable currency convertible into a cash-redeemable second currency, Louisiana's legal position is now unambiguous and the statute is presently in force.
No other Louisiana-specific consumer-protection development touching virtual currency was identified this cycle. The VCBA licensing regime administered by the Office of Financial Institutions is unaffected by this gambling-law change; Act 182 operates as an independent criminal-law overlay rather than an amendment to the state's virtual-currency licensing framework.
Outlook
Watch for Louisiana Attorney General enforcement activity specifically invoking Act 182 against dual-currency platform operators in upcoming cycles, and for any guidance from the Office of Financial Institutions clarifying the boundary between a compliant VCBA-licensed virtual-currency activity and a product structure that falls within the amended gambling-by-computer definition. Given the magnitude of the fine increase and the explicit statutory targeting, further enforcement action following the August 1, 2026 effective date should be considered likely rather than speculative.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (2)
T4 · CoinDeskCoinDesk — Under the originating Louisiana virtual-currency licensing bill, applicants and their executives are subject to investigation of their 'experience, character and general fitness' as a licensing precondition administered by OFI.retrieved M3bindingin force
No dedicated Louisiana statutory custody-segregation requirement specific to virtual-currency custodians, distinct from general licensing fitness/bonding preconditions, was confirmed in this research pass.M3non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
No Louisiana-specific statutory carve-out or guidance addressing the state income tax, sales/use tax, or withholding treatment of virtual currency transactions was identified in this research pass. In the absence of state-specific guidance, federal tax characterization (crypto assets as property, per longstanding IRS guidance) would presumptively flow through to Louisiana's income tax base given the state's general conformity to federal adjusted gross income, but this state-specific conformity link was not independently confirmed here and should be treated as an open item.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (2)
No Louisiana-specific statute or Department of Revenue guidance on the state tax treatment of virtual currency capital gains was identified in this research pass.M3non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
No Louisiana-specific virtual-currency tax reporting obligation distinct from federal Form 1099-DA broker reporting requirements was identified in this research pass.M2non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
Louisiana has no identified state-level cross-border virtual-currency transfer restriction distinct from federal sanctions and Bank Secrecy Act frameworks. Federal OFAC sanctions screening and FinCEN money-transmitter/MSB characterization govern cross-border virtual currency movement uniformly, with Louisiana's OFI licensing regime addressing in-state money-transmission activity rather than cross-border-specific rules.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (2)
T1 · Financial Crimes Enforcement NetworkFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network — No Louisiana-specific outbound restriction on virtual-currency cross-border transfers, distinct from federal OFAC sanctions and FinCEN money-transmitter rules, was identified in this research pass.retrieved M2non-bindinga fact about the regime
T1 · Financial Crimes Enforcement NetworkFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network — Federal OFAC sanctions screening obligations apply uniformly to virtual-currency businesses operating in Louisiana as they do nationally, independent of the state's OFI licensing regime.retrieved M4bindingin force
No categories match.
Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across
groups.
Publication gate
Blocking. 1 failing check(s).
schema_valid
FAIL
min_quoted_text_present
waived — floor 0%
egress_verified
pass
every_practical_object_has_source_id
n/a — no subject in this jurisdiction
source_tier_integrity_ok
pass
jurisdiction_source_floor_met
pass
tier_a_b_national_primary_pct
85.71
aggregator_only_jurisdiction_count
0
manual_override
Editorial metadata
Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.
Editorial metadata for Louisiana, USA
Field
Value
trust.lawyer_review.status
never_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewer
no reviewer on record
trust.content_source
ai_generated
Provenance and declared absence
Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.
Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.
Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.